The FIFA President has overseen the largest single expansion of teams in World Cup historyīlatter's appealing to confederations in the developing world, most notably perhaps Africa's footballing establishment, is emblematic of that fact.ĭistributing more funds to countries in Asia or Central Africa, for instance, benefits FIFA in that it gets their votes for what they want. This has led to a system developing at FIFA where they look to appeal to confederations rather than individual countries. 'I think there has been corruption in the past, but I think like Sepp Blatter and Gianni Infantino and probably to an extent Joao Havelange, they weren't corrupt in a money sense necessarily, because if you're the president of FIFA, everything you're doing for every waking hour is on expenses, your need for personal enrichment is very low.' I mean, it's money directly and indirectly,' he says. 'I think, really, it comes back to money. Indeed, the way in which tournaments are voted for and awarded, with countries tending to vote in blocs rather than together, is likely to have had an impact on the decision, believes Fielder. In the face of mounting criticism from - particularly - Europe's biggest clubs, the governing body sought to cultivate a scenario in which it appeared those wholly against the move was against the global expansion of the game. Confederations tend to vote in blocs with FIFA appealing to those particular regions in a number of ways
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |